Develop and organize arguments 5. Write the introduction 6. Write the body paragraphs 7. Write the conclusion 1.
As it neared takeoff speed, the Concorde struck a thin metal strip on the runway, causing one of its tires to burst. The strip had fallen from the underside of a Continental Airlines DC that had departed minutes earlier, bound for Houston.
Gases from the engines then ignited leaking fuel, touching off a huge fire. The crew wrestled the crippled jet into the air, but lost control moments later, slamming into a hotel.
All passengers and crew perished, as did four people on the ground. All along, conventional wisdom, bolstered by lethargic media coverage, has held that the fuel tank fire was the direct cause of the crash.
This from the Associated Press a few days ago, is a typical example of what the public has been reading and hearing: But while the fire was visually spectacular — caught on camera, it trails behind the plane in a hellish rooster tail — experts say that aside from damaging the number 2 engine, it was very much survivable, and likely would have burned itself out in a matter of a few minutes.
Not only was it survivable, but it was probably avoidable as well, had it not been for a chain of errors and oversights that, to date, nobody wants to talk about. The plane went down not because of any fire, directly, but because 1.
It was flying too slowly because the pilot at the controls, Christian Marty, had pulled the jet into the air to avoid skidding sideways off the runway and colliding with another plane.
Under normal circumstances Marty still had enough speed to climb away safely; however, he no longer had enough power. One engine had been badly damaged due to ingestion of foreign material — not only pieces of exploded tire, but debris from a runway edge light the jet had run over during the skid.
A second engine, meanwhile, was shut down completely by the cockpit flight engineer — at a time and altitude when he was not supposed to do this, when remaining thrust from that engine was desperately needed for survival.
All the while, the plane was an estimated six tons above its maximum allowable weight based on wind conditions at the time of the crash. At proper weight, the jet would have become airborne prior to the point when it ran over the metal strip.
The November 29th verdict was, if nothing else, fair. All along, aviation safety specialists were highly critical of the suit, believing as I dothat such prosecutions set a dangerous and destructive precedent, undermining crash investigations and air safety in general.
Voss, president of the Flight Safety Foundation, speaking in the Times article. However, does the full and true story of the disaster remain untold? I point you to a story that ran in the British newspaper The Observer in A link to the full article is here.
In addition, below, is a version that I have edited and condensed for clarity… Doomed: The great white bird rears up over runway 26 at Charles de Gaulle, immediately after takeoff. Already mortally wounded, flames bleed uncontrollably from beneath the left-hand wing.
The official investigation has focused almost entirely on the fire. According to the French accident investigation bureau, the BEA, it broke out when the plane passed over a strip of metal on the runway. A tyre burst; a chunk of rubber thudded into a fuel tank inside the wing; jet fuel poured out of a hole and ignited.
The hot gases caused two of the engines to falter, and despite a valiant struggle by Captain Christian Marty, a daredevil skier who once crossed the Atlantic on a windsurf board, the loss of thrust made the crash inevitable.
An investigation by The Observer suggests the truth is much more complicated. This appears to have been a crash with more than one contributing factor, most of which were avoidable.
Go back to that photograph. Its passengers included Jacques Chirac and his wife, the President and first lady of France, returning from the G7 summit.
Concorde looks to be nearby because it had been close to hitting thean event which would have turned both aircraft into a giant fireball. But he had no choice: That might have ripped off the landing gear, leaving Concorde to overturn and blow up on its own. If not, the lay straight ahead. Although the BEA disputes it, there is compelling evidence that it was the missing spacer which may have caused the plane to skew to the left, so forcing Marty to leave the ground too early.
At the same time, the plane was operating outside its legally certified limits. When it stood at the end of the runway, ready to roll, it was more than six tonnes over its approved maximum takeoff weight for the given conditions, with its centre of gravity pushed dangerously far to the rear.
Even before the blowout, Marty was already pushing the envelope. When the undercarriage bogeys are taken apart and reassembled, the work must be done according to a rigid formula, and rigorously inspected and assessed.
The part which was lifed was the left undercarriage beam — the horizontal tube through which the two wheel axles pass at each end.Jan 20, · A very interesting paradox you have raised about Maugham's theoretical conceptions and their clash with the reality.
I have found somewhat similarly his endings with suicide unconvincing - half of his first mature collection indeed, quite chilling leslutinsduphoenix.com: Sandhya Iyer.
Tisquantum (/ t ɪ s ˈ k w ɒ n t ə m /; c. (±10 years?) – late November O.S.), more commonly known by the diminutive variant Squanto (/ ˈ s k w ɒ n t oʊ /), was a member of the Patuxet tribe best known for being an early liaison between the native populations in Southern New England and the Mayflower Pilgrims who made their settlement at the site of Squanto's former summer.
Here is a full author Q&A about LITTLE BEE / THE OTHER HAND – everything from the true stories surrounding the novel right through to discussion of its characters and themes.
These are the questions that readers and interviewers have been asking me, and I’ve tried to answer them as best as I can. I hope you’ll find this helpful. Get the latest news and analysis in the stock market today, including national and world stock market news, business news, financial news and more.
Straight Shooting Straight Shooting () is an early Western.. Considered as a movie, Straight Shooting is not very good: The story is filled with cliched elements.
Characterization is poor: the characters have few individual traits, and rarely come alive. The “I have” time is the single worst flaw in the BNI program. Here is why; there is informal pressure to show up at the meeting with something every week.